If they can try to shut down Greenpeace, they’re going to shut down everybody,” says Indigenous activist Winona LaDuke.

In court filings, the attorneys for Greenpeace say they should be able to cross-examine the former Dakota Access Pipeline ...

Energy Transfer claims Greenpeace aided and abetted criminal behavior by protesters during demonstrations against the pipeline in 2016 and 2017, and deliberately defamed the company to pressure banks ...

This week marks the official kickoff of a long-brewing, high-stakes trial that could change the American environmental ...

Greenpeace provided supplies, intel and training to demonstrators who spent months camping near the Dakota Access Pipeline ...

A closely watched civil trial that began in North Dakota last week could bankrupt Greenpeace and chill environmental activism ...

The jury in the civil damages trial over the Dakota Access Pipeline protests has already heard lengthy testimony from both ...

Representatives of several tribal nations demonstrate in August 2016 in Bismarck against the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Kyle ...

Dakota Access spent billions developing the pipeline and has standing contracts requiring DAPL to continue transporting oil, the company wrote in a brief filed in court. Since 2017, the more than ...

An attorney for Energy Transfer claimed it was "a day of reckoning," while Greenpeace attorneys said there was no evidence to prove the pipeline owner's claims.

A Lakota organizer said in a video deposition played to jurors that the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe led the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, not Greenpeace.